Long term the lack of a patent will only help to encourage innovation with Graphene, and will allow companies to find currently unimaginable uses.
We considered patenting; we prepared a patent and it was nearly filed. Then I had an interaction with a big, multinational electronics company. I approached a guy at a conference and said, "We've got this patent coming up, would you be interested in sponsoring it over the years?" It's quite expensive to keep a patent alive for 20 years. The guy told me, "We are looking at graphene, and it might have a future in the long term. If after ten years we find it's really as good as it promises, we will put a hundred patent lawyers on it to write a hundred patents a day, and you will spend the rest of your life, and the gross domestic product of your little island, suing us." That's a direct quote.I considered this arrogant comment, and I realized how useful it was. There was no point in patenting graphene at that stage. You need to be specific: you need to have a specific application and an industrial partner. Unfortunately, in many countries, including this one, people think that applying for a patent is an achievement. In my case it would have been a waste of taxpayers' money.
Quick story
Graphene is a one-atom-thick sheet of carbon. The discovery of graphene has been rewarded with Nobel Prize, in 2010 to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov. It is real and has already been produced from graphite, the scale of production still remains the main restriction.
Most of the research is still at the early stage and graphene products have not yet reached the masses in commercial use, however there is a big push for investment into graphene.
Graphene, even though being the thinnest material ever, is super strong. Graphene may at first sound like science fiction, with all it's declared super attributes in many areas. Those include:
Showing posts with label Andrew-Geim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew-Geim. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Andrew Geim explains why Graphene is not patented
In an interview from 2010 Andre Geim mentions why Graphene isn't patented.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
UK Govt Squandering Science Funds
In a letter to the The Daily Telegraph a group of scientists including Sir Andrew Geim accuse the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of interferign with funding for science projects to meet policy objectives.
This letter is arriving on the same day that another group of another 100 scientists are delivering a coffin to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council to protest the death of science.
“The EPSRC is no longer allocating funds on a fair and transparent basis,” the letter says. “Excellence is a secondary consideration. The wealth of talent following new ideas, which could and would compete for such funding, is being side-lined on the whims of administrators. Non-competitive processes, in whatever arena, are a poor investment and such misuse of public funds is deeply worrying.”
This letter is arriving on the same day that another group of another 100 scientists are delivering a coffin to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council to protest the death of science.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Sir Andre Geim is Knighted
Already a Nobel laureate, Sir Andrew Geim, one of the original discoverers of Graphene has now been Knighted.
I'm surprised it took 8 years, but apparently the Queen is a bit slow in her advanced age.
Sir Andre Geim, the scientist from the University of Manchester who discovered the "wonder material" graphene with colleague Professor Konstantin Novoselov, has been awarded a knighthood.
I'm surprised it took 8 years, but apparently the Queen is a bit slow in her advanced age.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)